ORDA - Online Research Data Archive 
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   ORDA Home
    • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Division of Surgery
    • Trauma and Orthopaedics
    • View Item
    •   ORDA Home
    • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Division of Surgery
    • Trauma and Orthopaedics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Conservative Versus Surgical Management of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review.

    Thumbnail
    Abstract
    Several studies have been published regarding the treatment of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries for professional overhead athletes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding non-professional athletes. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the rate of outcome scores and complications of conservative versus operative treatments both in non-professional athletes and in non-sport-related trauma patients with MUCL lesions. A systematic review of the published literature was performed by applying the PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted using three databases: Medline, Science Direct, and Web of Science. The keywords used were "ulnar collateral ligament injury," "elbow," "surgery," and "conservative treatment". Patients were divided into three groups: patients who underwent conservative treatment (C-group), surgical treatment (S-group), and surgery after a failed conservative treatment (C&S-group). Clinical outcomes were analyzed: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Conway scale, Carson score, and Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score (KJOC). A total of 15 studies were included, evaluating 513 patients. Although good and excellent outcomes were found for most patients during daily and/or sport activities, independently of the type of treatment, the C-group had better results. Excellent results were found in 98.8% of the C-group, in 88.1% of the S-group, and in 87.7% of the C&S-group. The complication rate in the C-group was statistically higher compared to the S and C&S groups (P < 0.001). However, its complication rate was higher with lower patient satisfaction. There is insufficient evidence to establish statistically significant differences in the effects of conservative versus surgical treatments on the functional outcomes of patients with MUCL lesions. However, a period of rehabilitation therapy and the functional request of the single injured subject are useful to discern which patients genuinely require MUCL surgical repair.
    URI
    https://orda.derbyhospitals.nhs.uk/handle/123456789/2155
    Collections
    • Trauma and Orthopaedics [218]
    Date
    2019-11
    Author
    Volpin, Andrea
    Show full item record
    (627) Orthopaedic Surgery.pdf (593.2Kb)

    copyright © 2017  Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Powered by KnowledgeArc
     

     

    Browse

    All of ORDACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Researcher Profiles

    Researchers

    My Account

    Login

    copyright © 2017  Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Powered by KnowledgeArc