ORDA - Online Research Data Archive 
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   ORDA Home
    • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Division of Surgery
    • General Surgery and Urology
    • View Item
    •   ORDA Home
    • University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
    • Division of Surgery
    • General Surgery and Urology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Mortality from esophagectomy for esophageal cancer across low, middle, and high-income countries: An international cohort study

    Thumbnail
    Abstract
    Background: No evidence currently exists characterising global outcomes following major cancersurgery, including esophageal cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to characteriseimpact of high income countries (HIC) versus low and middle income countries (LMIC)on the outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Method: This international multi-center prospective study across 137 hospitals in 41 countriesincluded patients who underwent an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, with 90-dayfollow-up. The main explanatory variable was country income, defined according tothe World Bank Data classification. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality,and secondary outcomes were composite leaks (anastomotic leak or conduit necrosis)and major complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade III - V). Multivariable generalized estimatingequation models were used to produce adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidenceintervals (CI 95%). Results: Between April 2018 to December 2018, 2247 patients were included. Patients from HICwere more significantly older, with higher ASA grade, and more advanced tumors. Patientsfrom LMIC had almost three-fold increase in 90-day mortality, compared to HIC (9.4%vs 3.7%, p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, LMIC were independently associated withhigher 90-day mortality (OR: 2.31, CI 95%: 1.17–4.55, p = 0.015). However, LMIC were not independently associated with higherrates of anastomotic leaks (OR: 1.06, CI 95%: 0.57–1.99, p = 0.9) or major complications (OR: 0.85, CI 95%: 0.54–1.32, p = 0.5), compared to HIC. Conclusion: Resections in LMIC were independently associated with higher 90-day postoperativemortality, likely reflecting a failure to rescue of these patients following esophagectomy,despite similar composite anastomotic leaks and major complication rates to HIC. Thesefindings warrant further research, to identify potential issues and solutions to improveglobal outcomes following esophagectomy for cancer.
    URI
    https://orda.derbyhospitals.nhs.uk/handle/123456789/2388
    Collections
    • General Surgery and Urology [159]
    Date
    2020-12
    Author
    Iftikhar, Syed
    Show full item record
    (755) Eur J Surg Oncol.pdf (584.3Kb)

    copyright © 2017  Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Powered by KnowledgeArc
     

     

    Browse

    All of ORDACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    Researcher Profiles

    Researchers

    My Account

    Login

    copyright © 2017  Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Powered by KnowledgeArc