Patients With Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis Given Prednisolone Therapy Who Have High Circulating Levels Of Bacterial DNA are at Increased Risk for Developing Infections.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infections are common in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH), but little information is available on how to predict their development or their effects on patients. Prednisolone is advocated for treatment of SAH, but may increase susceptibility to infection. We compared the effects of infection on clinical outcomes of patients treated with and without prednisolone, and identified risk factors for development of infection in SAH. METHODS: We analyzed data from 1092 patients enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with prednisolone (40 mg daily) or pentoxifylline (400 mg 3 times each day) in patients with SAH. The 2-by-2 factorial design led to 547 patients receiving prednisolone; 546 were treated with penotxifylline. The trial was conducted in the United Kingdom from January 2011 through February 2014. Data on development of infection were collected at evaluations performed at screening, baseline, weekly during admission, on discharge, and after 90 days. Patients were diagnosed with infection based on published clinical and microbiologic criteria. Risk factors for development of infection and effects on 90-day mortality were evaluated separately in patients treated with prednisolone (n=547) and patients not treated with prednisolone (n=545) using logistic regression. Pre-treatment blood levels of bacterial DNA (bDNA) were measured in 731 patients. RESULTS: Of the 1092 patients in the study, 135 had an infection at baseline, 251 developed infections during treatment, and 89 patients developed an infection after treatment. There was no association between pentoxifylline therapy and the risk of serious infection (P=.084), infection during treatment (P=.20), or infection after treatment (P=.27). Infections classified as serious were more frequent in patients treated with prednisolone (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI,1.27-2.92; P=.002). There was no association between prednisolone therapy and infection during treatment (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.78-1.37; P=.80). However, a higher proportion of patients receiving prednisolone developed an infection after treatment (10%) than of patients not given prednisolone (6%) (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.69; P=.024). Development of infection was associated with increased 90-day mortality in patients with SAH treated with prednisolone, independent of model for end-stage liver disease or Lille score (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.41-4.30; P=.002). High circulating bDNA predicted infection that developed within 7 days of prednisolone therapy, independent of MELD and white blood cell count (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 1.80-12.17; P=.001). In patients who did not receive prednisolone, infection was not independently associated with 90-day mortality (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.54-1.62; P=.82) or levels of bDNA (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.39-1.75; P=.62). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SAH given prednisolone are at greater risk for developing serious infections and infections after treatment than patients not given prednisolone, which may offset its therapeutic benefit. Level of circulating bDNA before treatment could identify patients at high risk of infection if given prednisolone; these data could be used to select therapies for patients with SAH. EudraCT no: 2009-013897-42; current controlled trials no: ISRCTN88782125.